A group under the aegis of Watchdog for Progressive Ijaw (WPI), has described the House of Representative Committee on Public Account, handling the ongoing probe of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP), as selfish and not acting in line with the public interest.
The group, also accused the committee of having ulterior motives in the ongoing probe, adding that it is a mere distraction on the PAP’s Interim Administrator, Col. Milland Dixon.
The coordinator, WPI, Lambart Olambo, “Since the proclamation of the programme by the Presidency, the committee had never bothered to probe the financial dealings and activities of past PAP coordinators”.
He recalled that stakeholders from the region constantly called for investigations into the activities of the past Presidential Amnesty Program coordinators, who were enmeshed in corruption allegations but that despite public outcries including street protests against them, the House Committee kept sealed lips.
“We complained. We blocked roads and wrote petitions against past PAP coordinators, who deviated from the mandate of the programme and allegedly misappropriated funds and were even linked to contract scam, but these lawmakers failed to initiate any probe.
“What has really changed that they have now started probing PAP at a time PAP’s original intent and purpose are being realised by Dikio? Could it be that the current positive change in PAP is negatively affecting the fortunes of the lawmakers”, Olambo queried.
Olambo said they were not against probing Dikio but that they would resist any attempt to reduce the personality and character of the interim administrator with alleged malfeasance and mismanagement that occurred years before he assumed his office.
He said: “We are not against probing Dikio and we know that Dikio himself will not stop any probe against him. But any probe against him must be based on his activities, his actions and inactions not on the activities of his predecessors.
“It is usually said that the government is a continuum. We agree but that does not mean that a successor inherits the personal baggage of his predecessors. A successor cannot be answerable to the actions and style of leadership of his predecessors, whose regimes he was not part of.
“If there were mismanagement in the past and the committee is interested in probing it, then the committee should go-ahead to invite persons who were responsible for the mismanagement. All the past coordinators are alive and can be invited to defend their actions”.
Olambo said it was uncharitable and unacceptable for the lawmakers to subject Dikio to interrogations of financial activities that occurred in PAP in 2015, five years before he assumed leadership of the amnesty office.
“Where were the lawmakers then? Dikio has come to make a difference and we don’t want anybody to distract him. He has come to correct the ills of the amnesty office. For the first time, the programme has been returned to its owners in the Niger Delta.
“This is the first time we are having transparency in the verification and payment of contractors. The ex-agitators are receiving their stipends on the 25th of every month. It never happened before.
“Dikio is going ahead with the reforms of the amnesty office against all odds. He is out to make a difference and we are urging the House Committee to only monitor him and judge him by what he is doing and not to occupy his time with issues that have nothing to do with him”.